3rd Prize
All of the important points of the proposal are at the right places, better than at the rest of the participating designs. This might be the reason why this project has been favoured by a part of the Jury during the evaluation. Another reason might be, of course, a very understandable architectural language. In conflict with its outer simplicity is the inner logic. Situating the two levels of library above the multipurpose hall without any middle support in the lowest level seems as very problematic. A part of the Jury also does not understand why the relatively rich inner space changes are not visible on the outer shell. The intelligibility of the architecture seems then as superficial. The discussion was also provoked by the long row of roof windows. If it was meant as an architectural hyperbole, then it was not bold enough. It actually raised doubts about this solution as a potential justification of this weed of folk architecture.
